In July 2025, Russel Simon Wavik emerged victorious as Chairman of the Motu Koita Assembly (MKA), narrowly edging out contenders including the prominent Dadi Toka Jr. and other figures. His election, however, has sparked debate within political circles and community observers about the future trajectory of governance for PNG’s indigenous Motu Koita people, the traditional custodians of Port Moresby.
A Question of Experience and Networks
Wavik’s victory is notable not only for his relative obscurity in public records but also for his longstanding ties to established political players. Despite limited publicly documented achievements, Wavik has been a persistent contender in previous MKA elections, marking his fifth attempt at leadership.
More contentious are his close associations with Lohia Boe Samuel (LBH), Member of Parliament for Moresby North-West, whose tenure has been mired in controversy—including unresolved criminal allegations—and unfulfilled development promises for communities like Hanuabada and Elevala. This relationship raises questions about the quality of political alliances and their implications for local governance.
Development Deficits Under the Spotlight
LBH’s record as an MP has drawn criticism for failing to deliver fundamental services such as clean water, infrastructure upgrades, and education improvements in his constituency. The persistence of such deficits underscores the chronic challenge PNG faces in translating political rhetoric into tangible community outcomes. Wavik’s association with LBH consequently evokes concerns over continuity of governance approaches that have struggled to address these enduring issues.
Contrasting Leadership Visions
The race also featured Beatrice Mahuru, a candidate with a formidable professional background spanning corporate leadership roles, including CEO of the Digicel PNG Foundation, and active participation in educational and cultural institutions. Mahuru’s profile encapsulates a blend of business acumen, community development experience, and international exposure—qualities that positioned her as a candidate capable of bringing strategic vision and practical results to Motu Koita governance.
Her demonstrated commitment to empowering women and youth, developing community infrastructure, and leveraging donor networks presented a compelling alternative to the status quo. Her defeat in the election highlights tensions between traditional political dynamics and emerging calls for technocratic, results-driven leadership in PNG’s urban indigenous communities.
Implications for the Motu Koita and Port Moresby
The Motu Koita Assembly holds symbolic and practical significance as the representative body of the Motu Koita people, guardians of the land on which PNG’s capital rests. Effective leadership is crucial to address pressing challenges—from urbanization pressures and public health crises to cultural preservation and economic inclusion.
Wavik’s tenure will be scrutinized against community expectations for service delivery, transparency, and proactive development. His capacity to transcend entrenched political patronage and forge partnerships that deliver real benefits will be a key test.
Broader Reflections on PNG Politics
The Motu Koita chair race illustrates broader patterns in Papua New Guinea’s political landscape: the persistence of personalized political networks, challenges in accountability, and the complex interplay between traditional authority and modern governance demands. It also spotlights the crucial role of leadership capable of navigating these dynamics while fostering inclusive, community-centred progress.
For the Motu Koita people, the election result is a moment of both risk and opportunity. While questions linger about the new chairman’s preparedness and alliances, there remains scope for renewed civic engagement and advocacy to ensure that governance advances the community’s aspirations.